I've noticed a fair number of punters here have analyzed the returns at SP at level stakes over a number of years.
These seem to show less loss on the more favoured runners.

I ask if anyone can save me years work whether they have assessed the returns of tab numbers.
I mean if I backed the same number for $1 on every race for 12 months would I lose the 15% take or does it depend which number I choose?.

Just to whet your appetite, here are results of TAB 1-9 for the 6 months period to 2nd May 2004, using NSW TAB Divs.
Performance Breakdown by TAB Number

Bets Wins Return % S.R. $ Profit % POT % S.R. % POT
1 6983 1198 5670.04 17 -1312.96 -19
2 7018 999 5658.10 14 -1359.90 -19
3 7041 892 5395.80 13 -1645.20 -23
4 7035 820 5723.90 12 -1311.10 -19
5 7024 726 5949.20 10 -1074.80 -15
6 6995 674 5426.70 10 -1568.30 -22
7 6819 548 5042.70 8 -1776.30 -26
8 6420 477 5140.30 7 -1279.70 -20
9 5795 402 4079.50 7 -1715.50 -30
The last figure being the LOT

Enjay



[ This Message was edited by: enjay on 2004-05-07 14:51 ]

Well I think I've just lost my appetite.
It appears that the animal is not aware of the TAB number it is carrying .

It sure does appear though that you members here certainly do your homework thoroughly.

Thank you Enjay.May all your winners be overs.

Mo.

howdy moeee
dont't be fussed about those results ?the question is what number should i use for what race?

yes that's the theory you should work on ,my results show a handsome proffit with the mix of numbers with races,example
race 3 no 3 or race 2 no 8 will give you a better way of making a couple of dollars.then you take those figures and refine them ?how many have won at the track ,distance,etc

i have one tonight which is newcastle race 7 no 5 skater boy at odds of 3-1...4-1 fast cash

Good on you fast cash for making good profits.

But I'm a reasonable man and I can't see the reason that a number prefers to come up in a
particular race number.
I understand the proof is in your pocket,but I wonder if you're actually just minding it for a while.

Apologies if I'm sounding rude to you.

Mo

appologies excepted moeee ? the main feature about this game is your desire for mathematical formulas such as numbers =weight=performance=handicap.
we all know that a certain percentage win in the top 3-4 weights,we know a certain amount of top weights win in thier respective races...e.t.c

the main ingredient in matching numbers with races is combined with maiden class1 class2 and so on ..you must work out these numbers with thier respective classes if u endevour a winning formula{BUT****the other part of a great system is the way you invest ,which is staking or target betting .you cannot win or collect if the desired disipline is not ! there to combine with the rest of the system..moeee i have been turning money over for some time in the fantastic racing industry ,only 2 weeks ago i posted a longshot system in this forum for the first time and recieved a great reaction to this formula ,so i decided to take the challenge and figure out this new and improved number,calculated,target betting system.fast cash.

Wouldn,t it be far better to FORGET TAB NUMBERS and just concentrate on those horses weighted at 55 KG upwards.
FELICITY WHERE ARE YOU?
Cheers.
darky.

Re tab numbers.Some years ago a Publican had this super dooper racing system.You know the one.Cant lose. 1 million in the first year on a $500 bank.
Heres the system. TAB 1 = Must have won last start
TAB 2 =must have ran 2nd last start
TAB 3 must have ran 3rd last start.
On and on ad nauseum.
Well the last I heard of him was that his pub had mysteriously burnt down during the night and he was flat on his arxx.
Funny that because he was using the system for around 9 months at that stage so he should have been FINANCIALLY SECURE as the kind system seller had told him.
Cheers.
darky.

Evening Darky.
What a classic 'mini thread' and gem of a last retort from you.

Full marks, my son.

Cheers LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB