Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
Reload this Page Why system betting beats punting-long term
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 17th July 2013, 12:18 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michal
Give me a man with a system. In the end he will have his system but we will have his money Or close his account so he cant get ours.
(the corporate bookie variation)
... because when he makes a deposit it goes into our account (and usually stays there!)

 Makes you think we should be at least aiming for a return resembling bank interest i.e. retain the capital and a marginal return on funds. Would be an impossible dream for 95%+ of us, me thinks.

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17th July 2013, 12:30 PM
dave101 dave101 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 107
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Old Time Bookie Quote.

"Give me a man with a system.In the end he will have his system but I will have his money".
Old time Chinese proverb. "A fool and his money are soon parted"

...Whether it be with system or without.
__________________
When I want to understand what is happening today or try to decide what will happen tomorrow, I look back... Omar Khayyam-1099
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17th July 2013, 12:44 PM
dave101 dave101 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 107
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosMos
One of the rules of betting that I observe...never bet with 'scared' money...if you cannot afford to lose the bank you are playing with, do not bet....if you can afford to lose, be fearless and trust your system.
Brilliant CosMos!!
__________________
When I want to understand what is happening today or try to decide what will happen tomorrow, I look back... Omar Khayyam-1099
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th July 2013, 04:05 PM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default
I did not listen to this race, but what "system" would have picked it ?

2013/7/17/
VR/4
Werribee

Distance: 1400M
Weather: Fine
Track: Heavy

10:UNE MOMENTO-
WON PAID: W.45.50 P.6.80 (TATTS)
TF 10* 12* 14 $2255.80
barrier:7
Weight:56.5
L3S:48X
RATED:81
RIDER; J DAROSE

That race more than likely would have had a jackpot Trifecta if it was not for this stupid partial Trifecta bet thing they have.

But someone got it.

The only "system" I see is heavy track, barrier 7, 1400 M
putting heavy emphasis on the heavy track and barrier 7,

fav was showing 1.50

What "system" gets these?
None that I know of.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17th July 2013, 04:50 PM
dave101 dave101 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 107
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz

fav was showing 1.50

What "system" gets these?
None that I know of.
The big advantage the punter has over the bookie is that he doesn't have to bet on every race.
In the race you mention, most sensible systems would not have had a selection in this race for two reasons-

(1) Odds on look on
(2) Don't back a system horse if there is an odds on shot in the race

Therefore we didn't win but importantly we came out square
__________________
When I want to understand what is happening today or try to decide what will happen tomorrow, I look back... Omar Khayyam-1099
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17th July 2013, 04:52 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz
I did not listen to this race, but what "system" would have picked it ?

2013/7/17/
VR/4
Werribee

Distance: 1400M
Weather: Fine
Track: Heavy

10:UNE MOMENTO-
WON PAID: W.45.50 P.6.80 (TATTS)
TF 10* 12* 14 $2255.80
barrier:7
Weight:56.5
L3S:48X
RATED:81
RIDER; J DAROSE

That race more than likely would have had a jackpot Trifecta if it was not for this stupid partial Trifecta bet thing they have.

But someone got it.

The only "system" I see is heavy track, barrier 7, 1400 M
putting heavy emphasis on the heavy track and barrier 7,

fav was showing 1.50

What "system" gets these?
None that I know of.
Not me that's for sure but the panels in this service,
That i use had them mentioned though not all.

I'm with you here to hard for me to find.

Talking winner only not the exotics.

http://www.skyracing.com.au/tab/for...12276&plusday=0

Cheers.
Garyf.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17th July 2013, 05:08 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile
Hi Your Lordship.

Thats why I consider Bernie the most intelligent fellow on the Forum.
He,s got his money parked in a good interest bearing account

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17th July 2013, 05:34 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz
I did not listen to this race, but what "system" would have picked it ?

2013/7/17/
VR/4
Werribee

Distance: 1400M
Weather: Fine
Track: Heavy

10:UNE MOMENTO-
WON PAID: W.45.50 P.6.80 (TATTS)
TF 10* 12* 14 $2255.80
barrier:7
Weight:56.5
L3S:48X
RATED:81
RIDER; J DAROSE

That race more than likely would have had a jackpot Trifecta if it was not for this stupid partial Trifecta bet thing they have.

But someone got it.

The only "system" I see is heavy track, barrier 7, 1400 M
putting heavy emphasis on the heavy track and barrier 7,

fav was showing 1.50

What "system" gets these?
None that I know of.

The back the Italian named horse and extra if the jockey also has an Italian sounding name system (my background is partial Italian).
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17th July 2013, 06:06 PM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz

The only "system" I see is heavy track, barrier 7, 1400 M
putting heavy emphasis on the heavy track and barrier 7,

fav was showing 1.50

What "system" gets these?
None that I know of.


The returning fresh from a spell system! I never Lay a horse returning from a spell, they get up all the time at big prices, just ask Speedy? He backs them all the time.

RP
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17th July 2013, 06:59 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Hi Your Lordship.

Thats why I consider Bernie the most intelligent fellow on the Forum.
He,s got his money parked in a good interest bearing account

Cheers
Point taken but after tax, inflation and falling rates, will there be much of a real return left, if any??

There is a better alternative I feel which has a good chance of preserving his capital over a period and gives him a stable return* Better on the tax side too. Won't mention it here for fear of being burned at the stake and also because I am not an investment advisor.

LG

* it feeds off the misfortune of others however but isn't this what we are trying to do here = win on the punt?!
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Contact Us - OZmium Pty Ltd - Archive - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655