Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th November 2012, 09:04 PM
WillB WillB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Thumbs up Tattsbet/Unitab rankings

Quote:
The Tattsbet/Unitab rankings have been mentioned in this thread.

I use them in a Laying the Field method where all runners for a qualifying race must have a minimum of three starts, and it also depends on the price of the fave. The liability for each horse is calculated exclusively on Unitab's rankings and am currently showing a profit on 74 for every 100 races.

If a winning horse is under the odds as per Unitab's ratings there is more often than not another horse over the odds that compensates for it and consequently provides a profit on the race.

I don't know if this is important to anyone but it has got me currently thinking about betting the field as per Unitab's ratings. Maybe someone might also consider Unitab's ratings?

Hi Michaelg - after an absence of about 9 months I am back and have noticed that you have being doing a few things in relation to these ratings with some success. The above did not attract much attention, but I think it may be worth exploring and hence this thread.
I will explore more tomorrow ... Will.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th November 2012, 10:19 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Hi, Will, welcome back.

I am using their ratings for a second Lay the Field method. There have not been many qualifying races but the results so far show promise and currently are generating a most acceptable profit. There should be a lot of qualifying races tomorrow including the Cup.

Because the rankings are so tight maybe they are more suitable for laying. I think it would be difficult to show a profit in betting the field which I hoped to do. Maybe there are other factor(s) that can be used in conjunction in the ratings?

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655