20% new account bonus!
Horse racing and
sports betting
 
 

Punt to Win

Pro-Punter
Premium Punters
Free $2,000 bet
Click here
Premium Betting Package
Free betting packages
Rugby union
Gridiron football
Special offers
Forums and free tips
Horse racing forum
Betting systems forum
Sports betting forum
AFL football forum
Bet online here
Free horse racing bets
Free sports betting tips
Free ratings
Tipping competitions
Free newsletters
Free racing newsletter
Smartgambler newsletter

Bonus in $US.
Online poker forum
Cup facts and tips
Casinoportalen
Casino - Poker - Topp 10 Poker - Bingo
AFL football
Rugby union

Gridiron football
Horse racing betting
Premium Betting Package
Gold Specials
Monthly profit report
Latest winning bets
Winning bets index

 

 

5/12/2003 edition

TAB Merger

It's not a must for punters
Larger betting pools do not add value for punters

With the proposed merger of Tabcorp and TAB Limited a hot topic, there is also lot of hot air about it in the racing media.

It has been seriously claimed that because the proposed merger will result in larger tote pools that punters will get better value.

That is mathematically false.

Unless a greater percentage of the pool is returned to punters and a smaller percentage of the pool kept by the tote, there is not one cent's worth of extra value. It's absolutely irrelevant whether the pool is $100,000 or $1,000,000. If the tote takes out 15% then a $100,000 pool has $85,000 left for the winning punters while a $1,000,000 pool has exactly the same percentage with $850,000 left for the winning punters.

It's as simple as that.

Making larger pools does not create value.

As a group punters are also not better off should there be, and this is debatable, greater certainty about the prices they will obtain in larger pools.

For argument's sake let's consider two pools, Pool A and Pool B, of $300,000 each after the tote has taken out its cut. If in Pool A a horse firmed from $5.00 to $4.00 as a result of late money and in Pool B firmed marginally from $5.20 to $5.00 how are punters possibly better off?

If the pools were combined the horse would have fimed from $5.10 to $4.50. How are punters possibly better off? Punters betting in Pool B instead of getting $5.00 ended worse off with $4.50. Punters in Pool A got $4.50 instead of $4.00. But that is just redistributing the money from punters in Pool B.

In this example the group of punters were no better off. It was simply a case of taking money from one group of punters and redistributing it to another group of punters, robbing Peter to pay Paul.

This edition of Punt to Win:
Tab merger - will larger pools add betting value?
2003 Japan Cup betting odds
System selling pests

Betting favourites in small fields
Money talks - Rosehill, Moonee Valley betting tips from the track
Handicapping tips - weight and class
Future winners - unlucky horses
Punt to Win 28/11/2003
Punt to Win index


Betting packages


Back Tote Longshots?

Horse

Get these prices? Or these prices!! Extra Profit $100 bet
Grumans 15.40 36.80 $2140
Touchy Subject 22.50 35.80 $1430
Rupanyup 12.30 22.80 $1050
Proudly Aggro 29.40 38.90 $950
Silver Canon 30.90 39.90 $900
Sure Bet 15.50 23.90 $840
Starbucks 11.80 20.10 $830


Specials
Free horse racing ratings service
Horse racing news

Best bookmaker betting odds
Super odds
Best online bookmakers
Best online poker rooms

Copyright ©1998-2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

Home | Contact us | Special offers | Horse racing forum | Advertise here

 
  Disclaimer: This site covers various aspects of horseracing in Australia. We provide betting tips, online gambling strategy and links to many thoroughbred sites. OZmium Pty Ltd is not responsible for the content of the links and also accepts no liability for financial loss or misadventure caused by the information provided here. We strongly recommend you bet within your budget and only with money you are prepared to risk.